Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. Holland

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 31, 1981No. 75-100, 75-098 and 75-099 CA 15225, 15224 and 15581 SC 27380PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTanzer, J.

These are three consolidated parental termination proceedings initiated by the state on behalf of three children, Stacy, Heidi, and Patrick. Judy Holland was the mother of all three children. Her husband at the time these proceedings were begun, Casey Holland, is the father of one of the children, Stacy.

The state sought termination of the mother’s parental rights in all three children, and termination of the father’s parental rights in his daughter, Stacy. The circuit court denied termination as to the two girls, Stacy and Heidi, but allowed termination as to the boy, Patrick. The state…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Johnston v. Oregon BankOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Greyhound Park v. Oregon Racing CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Professional Business Services, Inc. v. GustafsonOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Dunn v. GrayOregon Supreme Court · 1964

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Joint Council of Teamsters 37 v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  2. Alexander v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  3. McKnight v. Land Conservation & Development CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  4. Meriweather v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  5. Frank v. Department of Land Conservation & DevelopmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API