Cottrell Et Ux. v. Prier Et Ux.
Oregon Supreme Court
1Per curiam
This is a motion to dismiss an appeal. One ground of the motion, and the only one that needs to be considered, is that appellants have waived their right of appeal by accepting the benefits of the decree.
The suit is one in which the respondents, as vendees under a contract for the sale of realty, together with some personal property, obtained a decree of specific performance against the appellants. The decree, which was entered December 8, 1950, ordered the appellants to execute and deliver to the respondents their warranty deed conveying title to the real property in question and also to…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- O'Hara v. MacConnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Moore v. FloydOregon Supreme Court · 1872
- Staiger v. HolmanOregon Supreme Court · 1932
- Coker & Bellamy v. RicheyOregon Supreme Court · 1923
- Fritz v. FritzOregon Supreme Court · 1946
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Pacific General Contractors, Inc. v. Slate Construction Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1952
- Greenough v. Prairie Dog Ranch, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1975
- In re the Marriage of NimanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
- In re the Marriage of NimanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
- Housley v. Linnton Plywood Ass'nOregon Supreme Court · 1957
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.