Legal Opinion
Fries-Breslin Co. v. Bergen
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania
Decided March 4, 1909No. 314PublishedCited by 5 opinions
On Motions for Judgment Non Obstante Veredicto and for a New Trial.
1Opinion of the Court
HOLLAND, District Judge.
The Fries-Breslin Company brings this suit against the defendants to recover the sum of $110,723.92, together with interest from the 4th day of October, 1904, because of the alleged negligent performance of their duties as the plaintiff’s insurance agents or brokers in placing insurance upon plaintiff’s property.
At the close of the trial, the defendants requested the court to charge *361the jury that “the verdict must be for the defendants.” This was refused by the court, and in due time the defendants filed the following motions:
“And now, January 4, 1909, defendants, upon…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Oscanyan v. Arms Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Central Transportation Co. v. Pullman's Palace Car Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Dalmas v. KembleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
- Milliken v. WoodwardSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1900
- Kroeger v. PitcairnSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1882
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Knight v. Illinois Cent. R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1910
- Hassell v. Sterling Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nAppellate Court of Illinois · 1971
- Troxell v. Delaware, L. & W. R.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1910
- McCord v. Baltimore & O. R.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1911
- Hassell v. STERLING FED. S. & L. ASSN.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1971