Legal Opinion

Cole v. Commissioner of Correction

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided March 1, 2011No. AC 31517PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

2Per curiam

The petitioner, Arthur Cole, appeals from the judgment of the habeas court denying his April 20,2009 petition for a writ of habeas corpus based upon ineffective assistance of trial counsel. The habeas court also denied the petitioner’s petition for certification to appeal. On appeal, the petitioner claims that his trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance with regard to a plea offer when counsel failed to advise the petitioner of the likely sentences after trial and failed to advise the petitioner of the maximum exposure on the charges of which he was ultimately convicted. The…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. James L. v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
  2. Joseph v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
  3. Kiniry v. KinirySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
  4. State v. ColeConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000

4Cited by4 opinions

  1. Fields v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
  2. Person v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
  3. Westberry v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2016
  4. Cole v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API