Legal Opinion
Joseph v. Commissioner of Correction
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided September 29, 2009No. AC 29731PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
2Per curiam
The petitioner, Brenor Joseph, appeals from the judgment of the habeas court denying his amended petition for a writ of habeas corpus. That petition contained two counts alleging (1) that the petitioner was deprived of his right to effective assistance of counsel at his criminal trial and (2) actual innocence. On appeal, he claims only that the court improperly determined that he received effective assistance of counsel. We disagree and affirm the judgment of the habeas court.
The following procedural history informs our disposition of the petitioner’s appeal. On September 17, 2003, the…
3Cases cited8 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Crawford v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- State v. StevensSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by16 opinions
- Boyd v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
- Moore v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
- Sargent v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
- Corona v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
- Ramos v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.