Ex Parte Sharp
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
STAKELY, Justice.
This suit involves an interpretation of Equity Rule 63, Code 1940, Tit. 7 Appendix, which reads as follows:
“Clerical mistakes in decrees, orders, or other parts of the record and errors therein arising from oversight or omission may be corrected by the court at any time of its own initiative or on the motion of any party after such notice, if any, as the court orders.”
The proceeding is an original petition for mandamus filed in this court by Rudolf C. Sharp (petitioner) to require the Hon. George Lewis Bailes, as Judge of the Tenth Judicial Circuit of Alabama, to vacate a…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Rochelle v. RochelleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
- Cochran v. MillerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1883
- Aiken v. AikenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
- Powe v. McLeod & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1884
- Ex Parte MyersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1945
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Great Atl. & Pac. Tea Co., Inc. v. SealySupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
- Capps v. NordenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
- DuBoise v. DuBoiseSupreme Court of Alabama · 1963
- Busby v. PiersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1961
- Bell v. Mar-Mil Steel and Supply Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1975
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.