Aiken v. Aiken
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtBouldin, J.
This proceeding is to review a decree denying the petition of the husband to modify a decree for permanent alimony upon divorce because of changed conditions affecting the financial status of the husband.
Whefe a decree for permanent alimony is not for a lump sum, nor otherwise indicative of a division of property merely, but a monthly allowance for the wife’s maintenance, running into the indefinite future, and payable, if need be, from the future earnings of the husband, the court has power to modify the same because of changed conditions of the parties, whether such power be expressly…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Epps v. EppsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
- Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
- Bailes v. BailesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
- Bailes v. BailesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
3Cited by33 opinions
- Garlington v. GarlingtonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1945
- Worthington v. WorthingtonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
- Bratnober v. BratnoberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Bridges v. BridgesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
- Colton v. ColtonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1949
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.