Legal Opinion
Bell v. Mar-Mil Steel and Supply Co.
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
Decided March 5, 1975No. Civ. 496PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOLMES, Judge.
This dispute arises from a petition for writ of mandamus to compel respondent-judge to set aside an order requiring the petitioner to pay workmen’s compensation benefits in a lump sum.
In June of 1972, the Circuit Court of DeKalb County, Alabama, entered a judgment for workmen’s compensation benefits in favor of one Ernest Bell and against petitioner. No appeal was taken from this judgment and the judgment in pertinent part is as follows:
“IT IS .THEREFORE, CONSIDERED, ORDERED AND DECREED by the Court and it is the judgment of the Court that compensation is hereby awarded to the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Ex Parte TowlesTexas Supreme Court · 1877
- Slaven v. WheelerTexas Supreme Court · 1882
- Southwick v. . SouthwickNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
- Mobile Housing Board v. CrossSupreme Court of Alabama · 1969
- Alabama By-Products Co. v. LandgraffSupreme Court of Alabama · 1946
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Smith v. SmithCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1978
- BF Goodrich Company v. ButlerCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1975
- State Ex Rel. Hodge v. Town of Turtle LakeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1993
- Mayberry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1982
- City of Brewton v. White's Auto Store, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1978
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.