Faimon v. Winona State University
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CRIPPEN, Judge.
Respondent Winona State University initially employed appellant Mary Faimon as a social work instructor for three consecutive one-year teaching terms. After first representing to appellant that the same position would be available for an additional year, respondent reclassified the position to a ten ure track professorship for which appellant was unqualified. Appellant, unable to secure employment for the following academic year, and claiming that her unemployment was caused by her reliance on respondent’s promise, sued respondent under the promissory estoppel doctrine…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Thiele v. StichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Davis v. Re-Trac Manufacturing CorporationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
- Wartnick v. Moss & BarnettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
- Ruud v. Great Plains Supply, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
- Cohen v. Cowles Media Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Bouton v. ByersCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2014
- Greuling v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005
- Bryson v. Pillsbury Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998
- Meriwether Minnesota Land & Timber, LLC v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2012
- Servais v. T.J. Management of Minneapolis, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1997
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.