Legal Opinion
Ruud v. Great Plains Supply, Inc.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided January 20, 1995No. C5-93-527PublishedCited by 62 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GARDEBRING, Justice.
This case involves issues of employment law arising out of a relationship between respondent Kevin Ruud and appellant Great Plains Supply, Inc. (GPS). After he was terminated as the manager of GPS’s Sioux City, Iowa store, Kevin Ruud and his wife Diane Ruud sued GPS and certain GPS officials, alleging breach of express contract, breach of implied contract by promissory estoppel and fraud and misrepresentation. Included in the suit was Diane Ruud’s claim that, in reliance upon promises of GPS as to the security of Kevin Ruud’s employment, she quit her job, sold the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Pine River State Bank v. MettilleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Offerdahl v. University of Minnesota Hospitals & ClinicsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Hoffman v. Red Owl Stores, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
- Cederstrand v. Lutheran BrotherhoodSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
- State Ex Rel. Beaulieu v. City of Mounds ViewSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by62 opinions
- Karen Snow v. Ridgeview Medical CenterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
- Martens v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- All-Tech Telecom, Inc. v. Amway CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
- Travelers Indemnity Co. v. Bloomington Steel & Supply Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- Denelsbeck v. Wells Fargo & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.