Legal Opinion

Warren v. Schecter

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 23, 1997No. B096771PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KLEIN, P. J.

Defendant and appellant Lawrence Schecter, M.D. (Dr. Schecter) appeals a judgment in favor of plaintiff and respondent Janet Warren (Warren) following a jury trial of a medical malpractice action arising out of a failure to obtain informed consent to surgery.

The issues presented include Warren’s entitlement to calendar preference on appeal, whether her action against Dr. Schecter was time-barred, and the damages recoverable for the failure to obtain informed consent.

We conclude, inter alia: Warren’s medical condition entitles her to calendar preference on appeal (see Code…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Soule v. General Motors Corp.California Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Cobbs v. GrantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Agarwal v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Moore v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Gutierrez v. MofidCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Saxena v. GoffneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  2. Drexler v. PetersenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  3. Blue v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  4. Schiff v. PradosCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  5. Environmental Law Foundation v. Wykle Research, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2005

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API