Legal Opinion
Environmental Law Foundation v. Wykle Research, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 17, 2005No. A109252PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
POLLAK, J.
The Environmental Law Foundation (ELF) appeals from a summary judgment dismissing its complaint under the California Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act of 1986, Health and Safety Code section 25249.5 et seq. (Proposition 65 or the Act), against Wykle Research, Inc. (Wykle). ELF contends the trial court erred in holding that the warning of mercury toxicity Wykle includes with the dental amalgam it manufactures comes within the “safe harbor” provisions of the regulations issued under Proposition 65, conclusively establishing that the warning is “clear and reasonable”…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Cobbs v. GrantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Brown v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Carmichael v. ReitzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- Jennings v. Palomar Pomerado Health Systems, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2003
- Summers v. A. L. Gilbert Co.California Court of Appeal · 1999
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine v. McDonald's Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2010
- Yabsley v. Cingular Wireless, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- Charles v. Sutter Home Winery, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2018
- Charles v. Sutter Home Winery, Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Yabsley v. Cingular Wireless, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008