Legal Opinion

Droeger v. Friedman, Sloan & Ross

California Supreme Court

Decided July 29, 1991No. S014984Published

1Opinion of the Court

54 Cal.3d 26 (1991)

812 P.2d 931

283 Cal. Rptr. 584

JOHN E. DROEGER, Plaintiff and Appellant,

v.

FRIEDMAN, SLOAN & ROSS, Defendant and Respondent.

Docket No. S014984.

Supreme Court of California.

July 29, 1991.

COUNSEL

Cory A. Birnberg and William A. Reppy, Jr., for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Friedman, Sloan & Ross, James A. Dorskind, Jeffrey S. Ross, Howard, Rice, Nemerovski, Canady, Robertson & Falk and Jerome B. Falk, Jr., for Defendant and Respondent.

Lorraine C. Gollub, Ronald Melin Supancic, Sandra Blair, James Scott Veltman, Ronald Rosenfeld, E. Stephen Temko, Denny Kershek, Frieda Gordon Daugherty…

2Cases cited61 opinions

  1. Dyna-Med, Inc. v. Fair Employment & Housing CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Foley v. Interactive Data Corp.California Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Lungren v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Select Base Materials, Inc. v. Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Harris v. Capital Growth Investors XIVCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API