Legal Opinion

Buehler v. Buehler

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 8, 1946No. Civ. 15027PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.

From an interlocutory judgment of divorce in favor of plaintiff granted on the grounds of extreme cruelty, defendant appeals.

It is conceded by defendant (appellant) that the evidence supporting the charges of cruelty was sufficient to warrant the granting of a divorce to plaintiff. Defendant urges however that there is no evidence to sustain the trial court’s findings:

1 “That the property described in Paragraph TV of the First Amended Complaint is the community property of the parties hereto.”

The foregoing finding is supported in accordance with the following rules of law and the evidence…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Tomaier v. TomaierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Siberell v. SiberellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Dimmick v. DimmickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Farrar v. FarrarCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
  5. Busch v. BuschCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Nichols v. MitchellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Barham v. BarhamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Porter v. PorterArizona Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Sandrini v. AmbrosettiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  5. Berry v. BerryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API