Legal Opinion

Porter v. Porter

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided February 16, 1948No. 4896PublishedCited by 76 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, Superior Judge.

A brief statement of the facts involved in this case is deemed essential for a proper understanding of the law involved in the premises.

Pearl C. Porter, appellant and crossappellee, and Harold C. Porter, appellee and cross-appellant, will be, for the sake of convenience, hereinafter referred to as they appeared in the lower court, plaintiff and defendant, respectively.

The above-named parties were married December 25, 1928, and with brief separations, lived together as husband and wife until August, 1943. Two children were born of the marriage; namely, Anita Jean, born…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Pereira v. PereiraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Van Camp v. Van CampCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
  3. In Re Estate of PepperCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Falk v. FalkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  5. Blaine v. BlaineArizona Supreme Court · 1945

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by76 opinions

  1. Cameron v. CameronTexas Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Gapsch v. GapschIdaho Supreme Court · 1954
  3. National Industries, Inc., a Kentucky Corporation v. Republic National Life Insurance Company, a Texas CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  4. Carroll v. LeeArizona Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Neal v. NealArizona Supreme Court · 1977

71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API