Legal Opinion

Berry v. Berry

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 5, 1953No. Civ. 18624PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShinn, P. J.

Plaintiff Ernest V. Berry and defendant were married on December 19, 1942. At the time plaintiff owned three precision grinding companies located in Los Angeles, Phoenix and Oakland, having a net look value of $82,996.42, had $10,000 in a vault, and was sole stockholder of a corporation of net worth of $38,405.09 as shown on its looks. In November, 1948, plaintiff filed a complaint for divorce, and in April, 1949, defendant answered and cross-complained for divorce. By stipulation it was agreed the net look value of all assets as of December 31, 1949, was $238,-369.65. On January 5, 1951, by…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Pereira v. PereiraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Van Camp v. Van CampCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
  3. Falk v. FalkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  4. Logan v. ForsterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  5. Estate of GoldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Thomasset v. ThomassetCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  2. Estate of AdamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  3. Berry v. BerryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  4. Garten v. GartenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  5. Cardew v. CardewCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API