State v. Allen
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BRITT, Justice.
By his first assignment of error argued in his brief, defendant contends the trial court erred in admitting into evidence a photograph of him taken while he was in jail. He argues that the photograph was obtained in violation of his constitutional rights. This assignment has no merit.
While the record is unclear as to just what defendant is complaining about in this assignment, it appears to relate to state’s Exhibit 2, a photograph of defendant taken while he was in jail in Petersburg, Virginia, on 2 July 1979. Witness Lacy Goodwin, one of the victims of the robbery, was shown…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. Melvin TelfaireCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
- State v. AccorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
- State v. TuggleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- State v. SladeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- State v. WoodsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. SturdivantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- State v. YoungSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
- State v. DukeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2005
- State v. HuntSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- State v. HadrickSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1987
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.