Legal Opinion

State v. Duke

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 16, 2005No. 57A04PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRADY, Justice.

During the early morning hours of 20 March 1999, defendant Jeffrey Neal Duke brutally and mercilessly murdered Ralph Arthurs and Harold Grant, beating them with a fire extinguisher and stabbing both men while they were down leaving a total of four knives in the victims’ bodies. On 19 September 2003, a jury found defendant guilty of two counts of first-degree murder based on malice, premeditation, and deliberation 1 , and subsequently on 26 September 2003, the jury recommended a sentence of death. We find no error in defendant’s conviction or sentence.

FACTUAL BACKGROUND

As seemed…

2Cases cited82 opinions

  1. Lockett v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Ring v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  3. Atkins v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. Woodson v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Penry v. LynaughSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. State v. AllenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2006
  2. State v. TaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2008
  3. State v. PhillipsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2011
  4. State v. WilkersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2009
  5. State v. CummingsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2007

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API