Legal Opinion

Burgess v. Square 3324 Hampshire Gardens Apartments, Inc.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided April 3, 1997No. 96-CV-117PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEADMAN, Associate Judge:

The only issue in this appeal is whether the proprietary lease between appellant Richard Burgess and appellee Square 3324 Hampshire Gardens Apartments, Inc. (“Hampshire Gardens”), a housing co-operative, is an “instrument under seal” within the meaning of D.C.Code § 12-301(6) (1995), thereby entitling Burgess to a twelve-year statute of limitations on his breach of contract claim. Because the trial court erred in concluding that the proprietary lease was not an “instrument under seal” for § 12-301(6) purposes, we reverse.

I

The proprietary lease at issue is a four-page…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. M. A. P. v. RyanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1971
  2. A.I. Trade Finance, Inc. v. Petra International Banking CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1995
  3. Fox-Greenwald Sheet Metal Co., Inc. v. Markowitz Bros., Inc., Continental Casualty Co., Blake Construction Co., Inc., United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971
  4. President of Georgetown College v. MaddenDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1980
  5. Umana v. Swidler & Berlin, CharteredDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Murray v. Wells Fargo Home MortgageDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. Whittington v. Dragon Group, L.L.C.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2009
  3. Burgess v. PelkeyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1999
  4. Farouki v. Petra International Banking Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 2011
  5. Lancaster v. Fox, Jr.District Court, District of Columbia · 2014

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API