Legal Opinion
Burgess v. Pelkey
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided September 30, 1999No. 97-CV-1473PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RUIZ, Associate Judge:
Appellant Richard A. Burgess, Jr., challenges the trial court’s decision to dismiss his lawsuit on summary judgment, asserting that material facts remained in dispute regarding, inter alia, whether the Board of Directors of appellee Square 3324 Hampshire Gardens Apartments (Hampshire Gardens), 1 a cooperative association, was in breach of contract when it enforced amendments to the cooperative’s bylaws and house rules which affected certain rights and benefits previously held by appellant when he originally purchased a share in the cooperative. We affirm.
I
The proprietary…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Holland v. HannanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
- Etheredge v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
- Hibbert v. Hollywood Park, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1983
- Hidden Harbour Estates, Inc. v. NormanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975
- Saunders v. NematiDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Pietrangelo v. Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale & Dorr, LLPDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
- Biomet Inc. v. Finnegan Henderson LLPDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
- Willens v. 2720 Wisconsin Avenue Cooperative Ass'nDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004
- Woodside Village Condominium Association, Inc. v. JahrenSupreme Court of Florida · 2002
- Miranda v. ContrerasDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.