Legal Opinion

Carleton v. Civil Service Commission of Bridgeport

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided March 17, 1987No. 4710PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBieluch, J.

The defendant1 appeals from a judgment for the plaintiff in this quo warranto proceeding brought against the city of Bridgeport civil service commission (commission) and its superintendent of treatment plants, Louis Renkavinsky. The defendant claims that the trial court erred (1) in finding that the position of superintendent of treatment plants was a public office for purposes of a quo warranto action, (2) in finding that the plaintiff had standing to bring this action, and (3) in finding that the defendant could be ousted from his position after his permanent certification to it. We find no…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Town of Cheshire v. McKenneySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
  2. State Ex Rel. Eberle v. ClarkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1913
  3. Beccia v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
  4. Beccia v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
  5. State Ex Rel. Comstock v. HempsteadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1910

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Corbett v. GriffinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  2. Bysiewicz v. DinardoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
  3. Civil Service Commission v. PekrulConnecticut Superior Court · 1989
  4. Demarest v. Fire DepartmentConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
  5. Cotton v. City of ElmaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API