Legal Opinion

Bysiewicz v. Dinardo

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided May 18, 2010No. SC 18612PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*751 Opinion

NORCOTT, J.

The plaintiff, Susan Bysiewiez, brought this action against the defendants, Nancy DiNardo, the chair of the Connecticut Democratic Party, the Connecticut Democratic Party and the office of the secretary of the state of Connecticut seeking a declaratory judgment that, in carrying out her responsibilities as the secretary of the state, she has engaged in the active practice of law within the meaning of General Statutes § 3-1241 or, in the alternative, that the statutory requirement that the attorney general be “an attorney at law of at least ten years’ active practice at the…

2Cases cited60 opinions

  1. Powell v. McCormackSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. U. S. Term Limits, Inc. v. ThorntonSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. State v. GeislerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  4. Adams v. RubinowSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
  5. Kerrigan v. Commissioner of Public HealthSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. RMS Residential Properties, LLC v. MillerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
  2. New London County Mutual Insurance Co. v. NantesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2012
  3. GAMEZ-REYES v. BiagiConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
  4. Escamilla v. cuello/cabreraArizona Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Franklin v. Superior CastingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API