Legal Opinion

Mayor and City Council of Baltimore v. Baltimore Fire Fighters

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided October 6, 1992No. 1952 and 1953, September Term, 1991PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOTZ, Judge.

In each of these consolidated actions, appellees, Baltimore Fire Fighters, Local 734, and Baltimore Fire Officers, Local 964 (“the Unions”), sought a declaratory judgment and injunction to compel appellants, Mayor and City Council of Baltimore (“the City”), to arbitrate a dispute between the parties. One case involves a dispute as to reduction in staffing levels on fire engines (the “staffing” case), and the other involves employees’ right to use accrued vacation leave prior to retirement (the “accrued leave” case). Because both disputes are grievances and neither is so intimately…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. United Steelworkers v. American Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. West Irondequoit Teachers Ass'n v. HelsbyNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
  4. Town of Narragansett v. International Ass'n of Fire FightersSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1977
  5. Gold Coast Mall, Inc. v. Larmar Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1983

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Baltimore County Fraternal Order of Police Lodge No. 4 v. Baltimore CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012
  2. International Ass'n of Firefighters, Local No. 672 v. City of Boise CityIdaho Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Toledo Police Patrolman's Ass'n, Local 10 v. City of ToledoOhio Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. Prince George's County v. Fraternal Order of PoliceCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  5. Mayor of Baltimore v. Baltimore City Firefighters Local 734Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2001

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API