Legal Opinion
Prince George's County v. Fraternal Order of Police
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
Decided January 4, 2007No. 02660, September Term, 2005PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMeredith, J.
This appeal arises from an arbitration award entered pursuant to the collective bargaining agreement between appellant, Prince George’s County, and appellee, the Fraternal Order of Police, Prince George’s County, Lodge 89 (“FOP 89”). After the Chief of Police of Prince George’s County issued a memorandum announcing that he would make decisions regarding promotions in the police department using a “Rule of 3” (that is, the chief would choose from the top three ranked candidates, rather than promote the top-ranked candidate as his predecessors had done), FOP 89 filed a grievance under the terms…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lloyd v. Board of Supervisors of ElectionsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- Attorney General v. Anne Arundel County School Bus Contractors Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
- Gold Coast Mall, Inc. v. Larmar Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1983
- Board of Education v. Prince George's County Educators' Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Maryland Transportation Authority Police Lodge 34 v. Maryland Transportation AuthorityCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2010
- Fraternal Order of Police Lodge No. 89 v. Prince George's CountyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2010
- Fraternal Order of Police v. Prince George's CountyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2009
- Dove v. ChildsCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2007
- Gordon Grocery, Inc. v. Associated Wholesalers, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2007
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.