Legal Opinion
State v. Kessack
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
Decided March 16, 1977No. 764SC757PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PARKER, Judge.
The charges against defendant were properly consolidated for trial with similar charges against William Schlieger and Lloyd Schlieger, who were also found guilty. Each of these three defendants appealed. Their attorneys caused three separate records on appeal to be filed in this Court. There should have been but one. Rule 11(d), North Carolina Rules of Appellate Procedure, 287 N.C. 671, 705. Pursuant to Rule 9(b) (5) of the Rules of Appellate Procedure, each counsel will be personally taxed with a portion of the costs of the unnecessary records. State v. Montgomery, 291 N.C. 91,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- State v. FoxSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- State v. LynchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- State v. SimmonsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- State v. MontgomerySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. NelsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- State v. McDougaldCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
- State v. AllenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
- State v. PenderCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
- State v. TrippCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.