Legal Opinion

State v. Pender

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided January 17, 2012No. COA11-647PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bryant, Judge.

Where the trial court conducted a detailed inquiry and satisfied itself that a juror could be impartial and follow the court’s instructions, there was no abuse of discretion. Where defendant failed to meet his burden of persuasion, the trial court did not err in denying defendant’s Batson motion. Where the trial court took appropriate actions to minimize potential discovery violations, there was no abuse of discretion in denying defendant’s motion for mistrial. Where defendant was the aggressor, the trial court did not err in denying defendant’s request for a jury instruction on…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Wainwright v. WittSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Hernandez v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Powers v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Purkett v. ElemSupreme Court of the United States · 1995

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. MalachiCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017
  2. State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018
  3. State v. BarnesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018
  4. State v. ElderCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2021
  5. State v. ElderCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2021

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API