State v. Simmons
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BRANCH, Justice.
Defendant contends that the trial judge committed prejudicial error by questioning prospective jurors concerning their views as to capital punishment and by removing Juror Dozier from the jury panel because of her views concerning capital punishment.
Tips Court considered and answered the first portion of defendant’s contention in State v. Britt, 285 N.C. 256, 204 S.E. 2d 817. There the Court stated: “It was error for the trial judge to refuse to allow counsel for defendant and the Solicitor for the State to inquire into the moral or religious scruples, beliefs and attitudes of…
2Cases cited67 opinions
- Furman v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Witherspoon v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- State v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
- State v. LaundyOregon Supreme Court · 1922
- State v. WaddellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- State v. BarfieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- Smith v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1978
- State v. KemmerlinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
- State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.