Legal Opinion

Galbraith v. Panini

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 27, 1923No. Civ. No. 2561PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFinch, P. J.

The will of the decedent was duly admitted to probate and thereafter appellants filed their petition for revocation of the probate thereof. At the close of contestants' case the court granted a nonsuit and entered judgment of dismissal. The contestants have appealed from the judgment.

The contestants alleged mental incomp eteney, undue influence, fraud, menace, conspiracy and want of due execution. Appellants’ brief is not arranged in accordance with supreme court rule VIII [177 Cal. 1, 176 Pac. ix], requiring the presentation of “each point separately, under an appropriate subheading, showing…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. In Re the Estate of ArnoldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Snowball v. SnowballCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Estate of BairdCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Wilson v. McConnachieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Estate of RicksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Estate of LancesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Teel v. GaskillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Gavin v. Protestant Episcopal BishopCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Estate of ShayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Dixon v. EckenrothCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API