Legal Opinion

People v. Mendoza

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 8, 1986No. F005963PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BALLANTYNE, J.

Introduction

The defendant seeks review of postjudgment sentencing credits on appeal of an order denying his motion for relief by the sentencing court.

The procedural issue to be decided is whether a defendant may appeal from a motion to calculate postjudgment credits.

Facts and Proceedings Below

The defendant was received by the state from Kings County seven days after sentencing. He was accepted into a full-time credit qualifying assignment as a dairyman on July 3, 1984, 50 days after arrival to Soledad.1

*951On May 9, 1985, the defendant in propria persona filed an ex parte…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. People v. PreslieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  2. In Re MuszalskiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  3. People v. RoeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  4. People v. HydeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  5. People v. ChewCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re CookCalifornia Supreme Court · 2019
  2. People v. BoydCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2024
  3. People v. Macias CA5California Court of Appeal · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API