Legal Opinion

Kersh v. Montgomery Developmental Center

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided February 12, 1987No. 86AP-629PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStrausbaugh, P.J.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Court of Claims denying her claim for payment of compensatory time earned, but not used.

Plaintiff Lois H. Kersh, D.O., a.k.a. Lois H. Chambers, D.O., was employed by defendant Montgomery Developmental Center, commencing October 19, 1981, as a Physician Administrator 2 and Medical Director. In order to implement the provisions of R.C. 5123.85(E), the Department of Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities (“DMRDD”) required that each developmental center have twenty-four-hour physician coverage. Plaintiff’s contract with . defendant called for…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hadden v. Consolidated Edison Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1974
  2. Boehl v. MaidensOhio Court of Appeals · 1956

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Software Clearing House, Inc. v. Intrak, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. O'Brien v. Ohio State University, 06ap-946 (9-20-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. Hansel v. Creative Concrete & Masonry Construction Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2002
  4. Hanna v. Groom, 07ap-502 (2-26-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
  5. Klaus v. Hilb, Rogal & Hamilton Co. of OhioDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2006

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API