Legal Opinion

Klaus v. Hilb, Rogal & Hamilton Co. of Ohio

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided June 30, 2006No. C2-04-034PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

SARGUS, District Judge.

Plaintiff, Angela Klaus (Klaus), brings this action against her former employer, Defendant Hilb, Rogal & Hamilton Co. of Ohio, a/k/a Berwanger Overmyer Associates, claiming gender discrimination in violation of Title VII, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., and Ohio Revised Code § 4112.02, as well as a violation of the Equal Pay Act, 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq. Klaus also alleges retaliatory discharge, breach of contract and promissory estoppel. BOA asserts a Counter-Claim for breach of the covenant not to compete contained in her Employment Agreement. This matter…

2Cases cited54 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. O'Brien v. Ohio State University, 06ap-946 (9-20-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. Kehoe Component Sales Inc. v. Best Lighting Products, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2013
  3. Cahoo v. SAS Inst. Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2019
  4. Ohio Council 8 American Federation of State, County, & Municipal Employees v. BrunnerDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2012
  5. Abdulnour v. Campbell Soup Supply Co., LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2006

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API