Legal Opinion

Boehl v. Maidens

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided November 26, 1956No. 8184PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMatthews, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment for the plaintiff for $1,800 in an action for breach of a contract that contemplated but did not bind the plaintiff to transfer to the defendant a business known as Boehl’s Musical Bar.

The case was heard by the trial court without a jury, and, upon the request of the defendant, the court made a separate finding of facts and conclusions of law on the issues raised by the petition and the answer and cross-petition of the defendant. The defendant has brought to this court a bill of exceptions containing all the evidence upon which the finding of facts was based.…

2Cited by11 opinions

  1. In Re Columbia Gas System Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
  2. Software Clearing House, Inc. v. Intrak, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. Kersh v. Montgomery Developmental CenterOhio Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. O'Brien v. Ohio State University, 06ap-946 (9-20-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
  5. Grine v. Chambers (In Re Grine)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 2010

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API