Legal Opinion

Brown v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 20, 1935PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.

The theory of the demurrer and the court’s ruling is, that the negligence alleged against the owner of the automobile, ex necessitate, insulates the negligence of the demurring defendants as a proximate cause or one of the proximate causes of plaintiff’s injury. George v. R. R., 207 N. C., 457; Ballinger v. Thomas, 195 N. C., 517, 142 S. E., 761. The conclusion is a non sequitur on the allegations of the complaint. Keller v. R. R., 205 N. C., 269, 171 S. E., 73; Brown v. R. R., 204 N. C., 25, 167 S. E., 479; Sanders v. R. R., 201 N. C., 672, 161 S. E., 320; Godfrey v. Coach Co., 201 N. C.,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Harton v. . Telephone Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  2. Ballinger v. . ThomasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  3. Village of Carterville v. CookIllinois Supreme Court · 1889
  4. White v. Carolina Realty Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
  5. Wood v. North Carolina Public-Service Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1917

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Smith v. . SinkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  2. Dunn v. . WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  3. Groome v. . DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  4. Quinn Ex Rel. Quinn v. Atlantic & Yadkin Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  5. Montgomery v. . BladesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API