Legal Opinion

Montgomery v. . Blades

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 20, 1940PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSeawell, J.

Tbe plaintiff brought this action to recover damages for an injury which she alleges she sustained as the result of the concurring negligence of "William B. Blades, deceased intestate of Grace M. Blades, administratrix, defendant, the Southern Railway Company and the city of Durham, her codefendants. The alleged negligence of the corporate defendants consisted in maintaining an inadequately lighted obstruction or structure in Chapel Hill Street within the city limits, consisting of the middle concrete piers or pillars supporting the railroad bridge over the underpass of the street at that…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Gordon v. BedardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
  2. Hinnant v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  3. Williams v. . Stores Co., Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  4. Earwood v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  5. Speas Ex Rel. Shugart v. City of GreensboroSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Peoples v. FulkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  2. Peoples v. . FulkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  3. Spivey v. NewmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  4. Montgomery v. BladesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  5. Montgomery v. . BladesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API