Legal Opinion

Rice v. Norman Williams Co.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided July 1, 1982No. 80-1012PublishedCited by 242 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rehnquist

Respondents in these cases obtained from the California Court of Appeal an extraordinary writ prohibiting the California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control from enforcing an amendment to the State’s liquor statutes. That court held that because the conduct contemplated by the amendment was per se illegal under the Sherman Act, the statute on its face was invalid pursuant to the Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution. 108 Cal. App. 3d 348, 166 Cal. Rptr. 563 (1980). We conclude that the California Court of Appeal was mistaken in its application of antitrust and pre-emption…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Parker v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. Vance v. BradleySupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Continental T. v. Inc. v. GTE Sylvania Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Minnesota v. Clover Leaf Creamery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by242 opinions

  1. Barnett Bank of Marion County, N. A. v. NelsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. PLIVA, Inc. v. MensingSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  3. Sanders v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  4. Grant's Dairy—Maine, LLC v. Commissioner of Maine Department of Agriculture, Food & Rural ResourcesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
  5. Fisher v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984

237 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API