Legal Opinion
Stubbs v. McConnell
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided November 14, 1903PublishedCited by 28 opinions
Motion to dismiss the writ of error.
1Opinion of the CourtPish, P. J.
1. An order dissolving, vacating, or modifying an interlocutor injunction and appointment of a receiver is not reviewable by a “ fast ” writ of error. Bacon v. Capital City Bank, 105 Ga. 700; Smith v. Willis, 107 Ga. 792, and cases cited. This was, in effect, ruled in this case at the last term.
2. As such an order is not a final adjudication of the case, a writ of error sued out to review the same is premature and must be dismissed. Civil Code, § 5526. Writ of error dismissed.
All the Justices concur.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Smith v. WillisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
- Bacon & Co. v. Capital City BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
3Cited by28 opinions
- Richards v. McHanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
- Grizzel v. GrizzelSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
- Touchton v. HendersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1924
- Bradfield v. AbercrombieSupreme Court of Georgia · 1921
- Wofford Oil Co. v. City of NashvilleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1933
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.