Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

AP Smith Mfg. Co. v. Barlow

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided May 19, 1953PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

26 N.J. Super. 106 (1953)

97 A.2d 186

THE A.P. SMITH MANUFACTURING COMPANY, PLAINTIFF,

v.

RUTH F. BARLOW, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division.

Decided May 19, 1953.

Messrs. Pitney, Hardin & Ward (Mr. Waldron M. Ward and Mr. Charles R. Hardin, Jr., appearing; Mr. Robert P. Weil, of the New York Bar, pro hac vice), for plaintiff.

Messrs. Stryker, Tams & Horner (Mr. Josiah Stryker appearing), for defendants, except the Attorney-General.

Mr. Theodore D. Parsons (Mr. Thomas P. Cook appearing), for the Attorney-General of New Jersey.

Messrs. Jackson, Nash, Brophy, Barringer &…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Home Building & Loan Assn. v. BlaisdellSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Boyd's Lessee v. GravesSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
  3. Proprietors of the Charles River Bridge v. Proprietors of the Warren BridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1837
  4. Hudson County Water Co. v. McCarterSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  5. Beer Co. v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1878

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Magierowski v. BuckleyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
  2. Karam v. StateNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1998
  3. Union Pacific Railroad Company v. Trustees, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Sabino v. Director, Division of TaxationNew Jersey Tax Court · 1997
  5. Union Pacific Railroad Company v. Trustees, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1958

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API