Legal Opinion
Karam v. State
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided February 13, 1998PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
BAIME, P.J.A.D.
This is a regulatory taking case. In 1924, Charles and May Schweinert purchased from the State the riparian land adjoining their upland property situated along the Manasquan River. Under the riparian grant, the tide-flowed land could only be used for construction of a dock or recreational pier. The grant required common ownership of the upland property and the riparian land. Although the Waterfront and Harbor Facilities Act of 1914 (N.J.S.A 12:5-1 to -11), more commonly known as the Waterfront Development Act, was in effect at the time…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Hodel v. Virginia Surface Mining & Reclamation Assn., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- First English Evangelical Lutheran Church v. County of Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- In Re Water Use Permit ApplicationsHawaii Supreme Court · 2000
- Mt. Olive Complex v. TWP. OF MT. OLIVENew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2001
- Panetta v. Equity One, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2007
- City of Coeur D'Alene v. SimpsonIdaho Supreme Court · 2006
- CASINO REINVESTMENT DEV. v. HauckNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1999
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.