Legal Opinion
Magierowski v. Buckley
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided March 23, 1956PublishedCited by 48 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
39 N.J. Super. 534 (1956)
121 A.2d 749
FELIX MAGIEROWSKI, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
DONALD BUCKLEY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued January 30, 1956.
Decided March 23, 1956.
Before Judges GOLDMANN, FREUND and CONFORD.
Mr. Ira D. Dorian argued the cause for appellant (Mr. Matthew Grayson, attorney).
Mr. Saul Neivert argued the cause for respondent (Mr. John T. Glennon, attorney; Mr. Saul Tischler, of counsel on the brief).
The opinion of the court was delivered by GOLDMANN, S.J.A.D.
The question before us is: Can a father maintain an action for the loss of…
2Cases cited64 opinions
- Munn v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Second Employers'liability CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- New York Central Railroad Company v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Noble State Bank v. HaskellSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Silver v. SilverSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Strock v. PressnellOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- Phillips v. CurialeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
- O'NEIL v. SchuckardtIdaho Supreme Court · 1986
- Houman v. Mayor & Coun. Bor. Pompton LakesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977
- Rybeck v. RybeckNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.