Legal Opinion

Asmus v. Ourada

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided August 18, 1987No. C6-87-589PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LESLIE, Judge.

Appellant Floyd Harvey Asmus appeals a summary judgment and an award of $3,250.50 in costs, disbursements and reasonable attorney’s fees granted in favor of respondent Francis J. Ourada. Summary judgment was granted on appellant’s contract claim because appellant’s counsel had failed to file his complaint with the court and tender the required filing fee.

FACTS

In August of 1979 appellant Floyd Harvey Asmus sold farm land by contract for deed to Jerome and Joyce Ourada. The contract provided for a purchase price of $275,000.00 at 8%, with a down payment of $60,000.00.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Erickson v. NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
  2. Peters v. Waters Instruments, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Pond Hollow Homeowners Ass'n v. Ryland Group, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
  2. Lee v. Regents of the University of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
  3. In Re the Estate of SmithCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
  4. State v. TapioSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API