Pond Hollow Homeowners Ass'n v. Ryland Group, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HUDSON, Judge.
On appeal from summary judgment in its favor, appellant contends that the district court erred by dismissing respondent’s claims without prejudice. By notice of review, respondent challenges the grant of summary judgment on its professional-negligence claim. Because respondent has failed to establish a prima facie case of professional negligence, we affirm in part. But because the district court erred by dismissing respondent’s claims without prejudice, we reverse in part and remand so that judgment may be entered dismissing respondent’s claims with prejudice.
FACTS
This…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Fabio v. BellomoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
- Star Centers, Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
- Admiral Merchants Motor Freight, Inc. v. O'Connor & HannanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
- City of Eveleth v. RubleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
- Waldor Pump & Equipment Co. v. Orr-Schelen-Mayeron & Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Superior Edge, Inc. v. Monsanto Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2014
- Minnesota Pipe & Equipment Co. v. Ameron International Corp.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2013
- Mci Commc'ns, Inc. v. Maverick Cutting & Breaking LLCDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2019
- Campbell v. Mold Inspection & Testing MI&TDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2022
- MCI Communications Services, Inc. v. Maverick Cutting and Breaking LLCDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2019
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.