Legal Opinion

Krizanich v. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided December 29, 1994No. 1 CA-CV 92-0461PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FIDEL, Presiding Judge.

This appeal requires interpretation of a binding arbitration clause in an underinsured motorist policy. The policy permits either the insurer or the insured to demand arbitration of disputed underinsured coverage claims. The arbitrators’ decision binds the parties concerning the amount of the insured’s damages if the arbitrators set damages at or below the minimum financial responsibility limits of the state—-in Arizona $15,000. Arizona Revised Statutes Annotated section (“A.R.S. § ”) 28-1102(6). The arbitrators’ decision is nonbinding and either party may…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Associated Indemnity Corp. v. WarnerArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Gordinier v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Mayflower Insurance Co. v. MahanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988
  4. Employer's Administrative Services, Inc. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1985

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Allstate Insurance Co. v. BradtmuellerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
  2. Mann v. New York Life Insurance & Annuity Corp.District Court, D. Arizona · 2002
  3. Huizar v. Allstate Insurance Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1997
  4. Allstate Insurance Co. v. BradtmuellerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
  5. Allstate Insurance Co. v. BradtmuellerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API