Legal Opinion · Dissent

Allstate Insurance Co. v. Bradtmueller

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided September 9, 1999No. 02A03-9809-CV-377Published

1DissentRatliff, Senior Judge

I respectfully dissent. Bradtmueller’s argument before the trial court was that because the term “award” was not defined in the insurance policy, “award” meant the original amount awarded by the arbitration panel, before any credits were applied, or $50,-000.00. Therefore, under Bradtmueller’s reasoning, Bradtmueller would be allowed the option to pursue a cause of action under the terms of the policy, the “escape clause,” because the award amount exceeded the financial responsibility limits of $25,000.00. See Ind.Code § 9-25-2-3.

Insurance Company argued that Bradt-mueller was precluded from…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Stevenson v. Hamilton Mutual Insurance Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. National General Insurance v. RiddellIndiana Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. Bauso v. Allstate InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  4. D'ANTONIO v. State FarmNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1993
  5. Krizanich v. Liberty Mutual Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API