Legal Opinion
Mann v. New York Life Insurance & Annuity Corp.
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided September 18, 2002No. CIV.00-1570 PHX-MHMPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
MURGUIA, District Judge.
Pending before the Court are the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment. [Docs # 33 and 34],
I. Background
This matter arises out of a conditional temporary coverage agreement (the “agreement”) entered into by the parties. 1
On or about August 28, 1998, Lucas Wiggs (“Lucas”) submitted an application for a $2 million variable life insurance policy with Defendant to Bruce Usher (“Usher”), an agent for the Defendant. At the same time Lucas submitted a check for $600 to purchase a $1 million temporary benefit for 90 days while his regular policy was being…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Jeanette Jesinger v. Nevada Federal Credit Union, a Federally-Chartered Credit Union Robert W. FleischmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Sparks v. Republic National Life InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1982
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- James River Insurance v. Hebert Schenk, P.C.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- James River Insurance Company v. Herbert Schenk, P.C.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- James River Insurance Company v. Herbert Schenk, Pc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Sandrasegaran v. Nationwide General Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2023
- Travieso v. Glock IncorporatedDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2023
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.