Alaska Roughnecks and Drillers Association v. National Labor Relations Board, Mobil Oil Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
EUGENE A. WRIGHT, Circuit Judge:
This appeal tests the validity of an order of the National Labor Relations Board which held that Mobil Oil Company [Mobil] violated sections 8(a)(1) and (5) of the National Labor Relations Act [29 U.S.C. §§ 158(a)(1) and (5) (1970)]. It found that Mobil unlawfully refused to bargain with the union representing the employees of Santa Fe Drilling Company which had subcontracted with Mobil to perform drilling operations on an offshore oil drilling platform. The Board asks enforcement, Mobil asks reversal, and the union seeks to have the order modified.
I
FACTS
A.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Armstrong v. ManzoSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- National Labor Relations Board v. Columbian Enameling & Stamping Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Grannis v. OrdeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- National Labor Relations Board v. Welcome-American Fertilizer CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Rivcom Corp. v. Agricultural Labor Relations BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
- Central Transport, Incorporated, Central Cartage, Company and Big John Incorporated v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- International House, Petitioner-Cross-Respondent v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent-Cross-PetitionerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
- Sun-Maid Growers of California, and v. National Labor Relations Board, AndCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- City of New Haven v. Connecticut State Board of Labor RelationsConnecticut Superior Court · 1979
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.