Wolf Mineral Process Corp. v. Mineral Separation North American Corp.
District Court, D. Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
SOPER, District Judge.
Twenty years ago an important invention was made in the. art of metallurgy relating to the separation of the metallic substances in pulverized ores from the nonmetallie constituents, consisting of quartz or rocky material, called gang-ue. In the prior art, ore concentration in actual practice consisted of water or gravity concentration, wherein, under different conditions of agitation, the separation of the quicker settling particles from tho slower settling particles was effected. It was also well known that oil and oily substances had a selective affinity for minute…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Minerals Separation, Ltd. v. HydeSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Florsheim v. SchillingSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Minerals Separation, Ltd. v. Butte & Superior Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919
- National Malleable Castings Co. v. Buckeye, Malleable Iron & Coupler Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1909
- Miami Copper Co. v. Minerals Separation, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1917
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- S. C. Johnson & Son, Inc. v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
- (PC) Pena v. JuarezDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023
- (PC) Turner v. ZeppDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
- GS Holistic, LLC v. A Robinson Recycling Center LLCDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024
- Pendley v. BennettDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2025