Legal Opinion

Blong v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 19, 2006PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Judge LEAVITT.

Michael Blong (Claimant) petitions for review of an adjudication of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Board) affirming a Workers’ Compensation Judge’s (WCJ) decision to suspend disability benefits after concluding that Claimant had removed himself from the workforce. In this case, we consider whether moving to New Zealand constitutes removing oneself from the work force, thereby authorizing the suspension of benefits.

Claimant sustained a bilateral carpal tunnel injury to his wrists and hands in the course of his employment with Fluid Containment (Employer) on…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kachinski v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Banic v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  3. Smith v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  4. Acme Markets, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Rebeor v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  2. Braz v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  3. Mendes v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  4. M.E. Chesik v. WCAB (Dept. of Military and Veterans' Affairs)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API