Legal Opinion

Acme Markets, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 20, 2003PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Judge PELLEGRINI.

Acme Markets, Inc. (Employer) appeals from an order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Board) affirming the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Judge (WCJ) granting Bard Purcell’s (Claimant) claim petition because the back injury he suffered at home was work-related.

Claimant was hired by Employer in 1978 and initially worked as a produce clerk. In the early 1980’s, he was employed as a night crew clerk and night crew manager. In those positions, he was responsible for unloading merchandise from tractor trailers and stocking the merchandise on the store…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Krawchuk v. Philadelphia Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  2. Commonwealth v. United States Steel Corp.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  3. Sheridan v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Anzon, Inc.)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  4. Township of Haverford v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  5. City of Harrisburg v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Waronsky v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  2. Verizon Pennsylvania, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  3. Blong v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  4. R. Bradley, Jr. v. WCAB (TFI Resources, Inc.)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API