Legal Opinion

Smith v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 10, 1999PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PELLEGRINI, Judge.

Willie Smith (Claimant) petitions for review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Board) affirming a Workers’ Compensation Judge’s (WCJ) decision suspending his total disability benefits after finding that he voluntarily removed himself from the workforce, as well as denying his petition for penalties because Employer had unilaterally ceased payment of benefits.

Claimant suffered an injury to his right knee in the course of employment with Dun-hill Temporary Systems (Employer) on February 10, 1994, and workers’ compensation benefits were granted. In October…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kachinski v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Banic v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  3. Moore v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  4. Nabisco v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  5. Armstrong World Industries v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. U.S. Airways v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  2. Edwards v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  3. Blong v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  4. Braz v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  5. Scalise Industries v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API