Legal Opinion
United States v. Michael D. Bonty and Charles E. Hall
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided September 7, 2004No. 03-3244, 03-3260, 03-3431, 03-3432PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BAUER, Circuit Judge.
Michael Bonty and Charles Hall appeal their convictions for the interstate transportation of a minor with the intent to commit aggravated sexual assault under 18 U.S.C. § 2423(a) and 18 U.S.C. § 2. Appellants challenge the propriety of evidentiary-rulings made during trial and argue that there was insufficient evidence to convict. We disagree and affirm the convictions.
The events giving rise to Bonty’s and Hall’s convictions occurred on September 27, 2002, when the men, both in their thirties, decided to try to pick up teen-age girls at a shopping mall in St. Louis,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Williamson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- United States v. Jerry ButlerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Richard O'HaraCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Wahid ShukriCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Thong Vang and Neng VueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- United States v. John J. Leahy, William E. Stratton, James M. Duff, and Terrence DolanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
- State v. ParedesSupreme Court of Iowa · 2009
- Cerabio LLC and Phillips Plastics Corporation v. Wright Medical Technology, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
- United States v. SamuelsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
- United States v. WatsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.